| Network Working Group | C. Jennings |
| INTERNET DRAFT | Cisco Systems |
| <draft-jennings-impp-vcard-02> | February 2004 |
| Category: Standards Track | |
| Expires: August 2004 |
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress".
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire in August 2004.
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
This draft describes an extension to vCard to support Instant Messaging (IM) and Presence Protocol (PP) applications. IM and PP are becoming increasingly common ways of communicating, and users want to save this contact information in their address books. This draft allows a URI that is associated with IM or PP to be specified inside of a vCard.
This work is being discussed on the imc-vcard@imc.org mailing list.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [3].
As more and more people use various instant messaging (IM) and presence protocol (PP) applications, it becomes important for them to be able to share this contact address information along with the rest of their contact information. RFC 2425 [1] and RFC 2426 [2] define a standard format for this information which is referred to as vCard. This document defines a new type in a vCard for representing instant IM and PP URIs. It is very similar to existing types for representing email address and telephone contact information.
The type entry to hold this new contact information is an IMPP type. The IMPP entry has a single URI that indicates the address of a service that provides IM, PP, or both. Also defined are some parameters that give hints as to when certain URIs would be appropriate. A given vCard can have multiple IMPP entries but each entry can contain only one URI. Each IMPP entry can contain multiple parameters. Any combination of parameters is valid, though a parameter should occur at most once in a given IMPP entry.
The type of URI indicates what protocols might be useable for accessing it, but this document does not define any of the types. For example a URI type of "sip"[6] might indicate to use SIP/SIMPLE, "xmpp"[7] indicates to use jabber, "irc"[5] indicates to use IRC, "ymsgr" indicates to use yahoo, "msn" might indicate to use messenger, "aim" indicates to use AOL, and "im"[9] or "pres"[8] indicates to use a CPIM or CPP gateway.
The normative definition of this new vCard type is given in section 3, and an informational ABNF is provided in section 4.
To: ietf-mime-directory@imc.org
Subject: Registration of text/directory MIME type IMPP
Type purpose: To specify the URI for instant messaging and presence protocol communication with the object the vCard represents.
Type value: A single URI. The type of the URI indicates the protocol that can be used for this contact.
Type special notes: The type can include the type parameter "TYPE" to specify an intended use for the URI. The TYPE parameter values can include:
An indication of the type of communication for which this URI is appropriate. This can be a value of PERSONAL or BUSINESS.
An indication of the location of a device associated with this URI. Values can be HOME, WORK, or MOBILE.
An indication of some of the core capabilities of this instant messaging system. Values can be PRES, VIDEO, VOICE, TEXT, SMS, NUMERIC, and BEEP. PRES indicates the system supports some presence protocol. VIDEO, VOICE, and TEXT indicate the system supports voice, video, and text messaging respectively. SMS indicates short text messages are supported. Short is not defined here, but something like 160 octets may be a reasonable assumption. NUMERIC indicates that only numeric text messages are allowed. BEEP indicates that the only information the system can deliver is that a message was sent to the target user.
The value STORE indicates that the system can store messages for future delivery to the intended user.
The value PREF indicates this is a preferred address and has the same semantics as the PREF value in a TEL type.
The following ABNF grammar[4] extends the grammar found in RFC 2425 [1] and RFC 2426 [2].
;For name="IMPP"
param = impp-param ; Only impp parameters are allowed
value = uri
impp-param = "TYPE" "=" impp-type *("," impp-type)
impp-type = "PERSONAL" / "BUSINESS" / ; purpose of communications
"HOME" / "WORK" / "MOBILE" / ; useful?
"VIDEO" / "VOICE" / "TEXT" / ; core capabilities
"SMS" / "NUMERIC" / "BEEP" / "PRES" ; needed???
"STORE" / ; like MSG
"PREF" /
iana-token / x-name;
; Values are case insensitive
BEGIN:vCard VERSION:3.0 FN:John Doe IMPP;TYPE=personal,text,store,pref:im:john@example.com END:vCard
Are PERSONAL and BUSINESS a conflict in meaning with HOME and WORK? In the TEL type HOME and WORK indicated a location, but they have slowly come to be indicators that personal or business communication is requested. Would a person with both a personal mobile phone and a work mobile phone have HOME,MOBILE and WORK,MOBILE?
Is there any need for SMS, NUMERIC, BEEP? This is not a system for negotiating capabilities and these seem like too fine detail. On the other hand the existing vCard supports pagers and such, and these definitions would help users avoid sending large messages to GSM cell phones.
Is STORE needed? It mirrors the functionality of MSG in the TEL type and is a feature supported by many IM systems.
section 3 forms the IANA registration.
This does not introduce additional security issues beyond current vCard specification. It is worth noting that many people consider their presence information more sensitive than some other address information. Any system that stores or transfers vCards needs to carefully consider the privacy issues around this information.
| [1] | Howes, T., Smith, M. and Dawson, F., "A MIME -- --Content-Type for Directory Information", RFC 2425, September 1998. |
| [2] | Dawson, F. and Howes, T., "vCard MIME Directory Profile", RFC 2426, September 1998. |
| [3] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
| [4] | Crocker, D.H. and Overell, P., "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 2234, November 1997. |
| [5] | Butcher, S, "Uniform Resource Locator Schemes for Internet Relay Chat Servers", Internet-Draft draft-butcher-irc-url-01, October 2003. |
| [6] | Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M. and Schooler, E., "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002. |
| [7] | Saint-Andre, P, "XMPP URI Format", Internet-Draft draft-saintandre-xmpp-uri-00, September 2003. |
| [8] | Peterson, J, "Common Profile for Presence (CPP)", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-impp-pres-03, May 2003. |
| [9] | Peterson, J, "Common Profile for Instant Messaging (CPIM)", Internet-Draft draft-ietf-impp-im-03, May 2003. |
| Cullen Jennings | |
| Cisco Systems | |
| 170 West Tasman Drive MS: SJC-21/2 |
|
| San Jose, CA 95134 | |
| USA | |
| Phone: | +1 408 902-3341 |
| EMail: | fluffy@cisco.com |
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2004). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Funding for the RFC editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.